Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 53

Thread: 2 barrel 2 banger

  1. #11
    Team Member JohnsonM50's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Jersey
    Posts
    602
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by zul8tr View Post
    ----------------------------------------

    That is a reasonable idea and worth a try. Like delayed secondaries on a 4 barrel carb.

    I remember an older Mercury (car) I was tinkering with. It was a stock 312 c.i.V8 with a 1x four barrel so I decided to replace the stock manifold and carb with a 2x four barrel set up. It definately was too much venturie area at the low and mid range if not careful with the throttle but was a stomper at the higher revs. The only set up that worked was the stock factory setup progressive linkage system. The front 2 barrels of each four barrel were operated together and the rear 2 barrels came in at about 70% open throttle.
    Yes it is. Theres a number of ways I can go with this & Im pretty sure Ill hit on something sooner or later. Ill go with simple at 1st then go into trial & error with the different ideas based on results. Ill need to test in a barrel with a test wheel at 1st then see If I can get some real test tank time with a prop on. Otherwise tho Ill be going by ear, spark plug color & seat of pants oh & some on boat testing too

  2. #12
    Team Member zul8tr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Orlando, Fla
    Posts
    509
    Post Thanks / Like

    Talking 2x carb

    Quote Originally Posted by JohnsonM50 View Post
    Yes it is. Theres a number of ways I can go with this & Im pretty sure Ill hit on something sooner or later. Ill go with simple at 1st then go into trial & error with the different ideas based on results. Ill need to test in a barrel with a test wheel at 1st then see If I can get some real test tank time with a prop on. Otherwise tho Ill be going by ear, spark plug color & seat of pants oh & some on boat testing too
    Post results and pics

  3. #13
    Team Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Eastern PA
    Posts
    661
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    That's not how dual 4 barrels were normally set up. The rear of the two (since its primary barrels were nearer the center of the manifold) was what the motor ran on most of the time. The front carb came in about half throttle, with the secondary barrels of both carbs starting to open at about 3/4 throttle. The setup was bog resistant and allowed normal running at low speed. It even idled well, as Buick "Wildcat" and Mopar "413 Ramcharger" owners can attest.

    Jeff (old geezer)

  4. #14
    Team Member JohnsonM50's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Jersey
    Posts
    602
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fastjeff57 View Post
    That's not how dual 4 barrels were normally set up. The rear of the two (since its primary barrels were nearer the center of the manifold) was what the motor ran on most of the time. The front carb came in about half throttle, with the secondary barrels of both carbs starting to open at about 3/4 throttle. The setup was bog resistant and allowed normal running at low speed. It even idled well, as Buick "Wildcat" and Mopar "413 Ramcharger" owners can attest.

    Jeff (old geezer)
    I never saw a 2-4 barrel 413 Mopar but got to drive several 426's, I worked at a Chry-Ply dealer & grabbed every opportunity I remember there being alot of pedal pressure near the bottom, not gonna floor that by mistake
    This little outboard Im messin with is typically designed with the single carb slightly favoring the top cyl. [position wise] If I do set this up as a 2nd-ary Id use the top side as the primary.

  5. #15
    Team Member zul8tr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Orlando, Fla
    Posts
    509
    Post Thanks / Like

    Talking carbs

    Quote Originally Posted by Fastjeff57 View Post
    That's not how dual 4 barrels were normally set up. The rear of the two (since its primary barrels were nearer the center of the manifold) was what the motor ran on most of the time. The front carb came in about half throttle, with the secondary barrels of both carbs starting to open at about 3/4 throttle. The setup was bog resistant and allowed normal running at low speed. It even idled well, as Buick "Wildcat" and Mopar "413 Ramcharger" owners can attest.

    Jeff (old geezer)
    ---------------------------------------

    Well I said it was the stock factory setup and that's how Ford set up their dual 4 barrel on the 57 TBird manifold and carbs that I placed on the Merc. They were the high top Holly 4 barrels and the rears had vacuum activation . Wouldn't know about Mopar stuff. I suppose you could do as you suggest but because the Holly's had small primary venturies the car had good low end throttle response.

  6. #16
    Team Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Eastern PA
    Posts
    661
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I was wondering if any olde time motorheads out there would catch my error: The 413 Ramchargers had its four barrels on a super long ram intake, one on each side of the motor, so this was NOT a progressive opening setup. I smartened up after making that goof, expecting someone would catch me on it, but...

    A bunch of other factory cars also used dual 4 barrels, including Cadillac, Pontiac (421 Super Duty) Ford (427 Hi-Riser) and of course "She's real fine my 409!" All of THOSE were progressive setups. Honest!

    Jeff

  7. #17
    Team Member JohnsonM50's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Jersey
    Posts
    602
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fastjeff57 View Post
    I was wondering if any olde time motorheads out there would catch my error: The 413 Ramchargers had its four barrels on a super long ram intake, one on each side of the motor, so this was NOT a progressive opening setup. I smartened up after making that goof, expecting someone would catch me on it, but...

    A bunch of other factory cars also used dual 4 barrels, including Cadillac, Pontiac (421 Super Duty) Ford (427 Hi-Riser) and of course "She's real fine my 409!" All of THOSE were progressive setups. Honest!

    Jeff
    I have heard of the 413's ram intake. Id guess not that many made tho. Ive seen the 413 luxury version [Imperials] but a little before my time.

  8. #18
    Team Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Eastern PA
    Posts
    661
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    They were spectacular to see: The Carter AFBs were above and just to the outside of the valve covers! That's a loooong intake tract. I rode in a 300K (I think) with that engine on a date once, and the motor ran smooth as silk. The guy never jumped on it once, to my utter disgust!

    Jeff

  9. #19
    Team Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Singapore/Melbourne/Italy
    Posts
    780
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fastjeff57 View Post
    I was wondering if any olde time motorheads out there would catch my error: The 413 Ramchargers had its four barrels on a super long ram intake, one on each side of the motor, so this was NOT a progressive opening setup. I smartened up after making that goof, expecting someone would catch me on it, but...

    A bunch of other factory cars also used dual 4 barrels, including Cadillac, Pontiac (421 Super Duty) Ford (427 Hi-Riser) and of course "She's real fine my 409!" All of THOSE were progressive setups. Honest!

    Jeff
    How about the Z28 302 dual quads.
    how did they work?

  10. #20
    Team Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Eastern PA
    Posts
    661
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Progressive also. I almost bought one of those cars, but the salemen at the Chevy dealership never heard of a Z28! (This was the Camaro's first year.) I bought a Firebird 400 instead--a dog.

    Jeff

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Marshall Grant
    By jrome in forum Boat Racing Encyclopedia
    Replies: 85
    Last Post: 02-09-2021, 12:20 PM
  2. British Anzani A & B Stock & Alky Racing Engines
    By John (Taylor) Gabrowski in forum Outboard Racing History
    Replies: 405
    Last Post: 04-11-2010, 09:12 AM
  3. Fastest Run By A Quincy Flathead 6 cylinder?
    By John (Taylor) Gabrowski in forum Outboard Racing History
    Replies: 100
    Last Post: 11-08-2008, 07:54 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •