Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: Class Consolidation....

  1. #1
    Team Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Saint Lucie, Florida
    Posts
    21
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Class Consolidation....

    Just wanted to start a small discussion about some class consolidations and everyone's opinion,...

    My thought behind doing some consolidation, is that if they are done properly, people can merge classes with minimum cost, increasing the strength of a class, and making a "path" for people to follow easier.

    I think this could be advantageous in several areas, what does everyone else think?

    I think you may have some attrition due to people just refusing to change, but think you may see a net increase because of the seemingly bigger classes(?)

    Wayne

  2. #2
    Sam Cullis Mark75H's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Annapolis, MD USA
    Posts
    1,795
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Its a noble and worthy ideal, but the application is nearly impossible. No 2 classes are identical enough to combine without some handicapping. No one wants to run slower than they already do ... there us often someone who figures out how to go just as fast with the handicap. More often the handicap scheme's first iteration has a major error and either the boats aren't slowed at all or are slowed too much. How do you handicap and equalize both top speed and acceleration?

    Solve all of these problems and you will have many backers, leave out any single one and no one will support your method.
    Since 1925, about 150 different racing outboards have been made.


  3. #3
    - Skoontz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Encinitas, California
    Posts
    581
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Talk to the guys in NBRA about how they work it...It makes a great deal of sense and would solve a lot of time on the wwater problems. But implementing anything that would make sense is often near impossible to pull off. I've thought for years you merge classes, runa 2 hour long race with different start times, like Parker is run would make a great deal more sense to the crowd who would buy tickets and consessions as soon as the races moved to places where people were walking by. Then, without dropping a half million dollars of forums that already exist privately, you will see growth. But who am I.....
    Bill Schwab
    Dirty Deck Brewing
    Company

  4. #4
    Sam Cullis Mark75H's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Annapolis, MD USA
    Posts
    1,795
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Running classes together on the course is different from consolidation.

    I am for running close classes together to shorten the day. I think there should be a rigid bracketing scheme to allow all boats that fit under current rules to run at every race for their category.
    Since 1925, about 150 different racing outboards have been made.


  5. #5
    Team Member jrome's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    stafford texas
    Posts
    179
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Class Consolidation

    I have thought for years that the biggest problem with boat racing in the US is we have too many classes. Everybody cannot be a National Champion. In other countries in the world, they do not run as many classes as we do. Consolidation would put better shows on the water. In Lone Star we ran A and B Hydro and CDF Hyrdro. We scored 1st place in each class and after that you got second, third, forth and so on, no matter which class you were driving. Lots of boats on the water, great show for the spectators. You can run more heats because of the consolidation of the classes. But, I know of no one that wants to give up their class. Just letting you know what we used to do successfully in Texas.....Also, I saw Tommy Christopher win X Hydro in Alexandria with an A Hydro.

    Just Saying..........................Not Preaching...........................

  6. #6
    Team Member AZOutlaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Glendale, AZ
    Posts
    0
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Stock Outboard Racing Commission

    As an SORC member, I made the motion at the last National meeting to adopt Dean Sutherland's class reduction proposal for the Stock Category. With the understanding that Parody Committee's would be formed, the SORC actually sent it to membership vote. It failed with 2/3 membership voting to leave as is.
    Not saying that another proposal won't be submitted again this year. Many of the supporters of the defeated proposal from the SORC, will be tweaking, and presenting another class reduction proposal at this years national meeting.

  7. #7
    - Skoontz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Encinitas, California
    Posts
    581
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Explain consolidation vs running together...In my meaning, running classes together is consolidating the burden of the day, and you will see full fields vs 4 boats at a time runing the course...You simply score each class differently. You are consolidating the amount of water time taken. Thats the gold of the day, the most valuable thing of the day is time on that water. Cut that down, dont drag the days out so long with all the wait time bnetween classes, get the show on a busy lake and watch it grow.
    Bill Schwab
    Dirty Deck Brewing
    Company

  8. #8
    Team Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Saint Lucie, Florida
    Posts
    21
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    By consolidation, I mean elimination / merging of classes;

    There are a handful or more of classes, where the equipment, speeds / etc. are close; it needs to be kept fair, so someone would have to change something.

    As an example; in Outboards, CSH and 20SSH, both classes use essentially the same powerheads - well, I should say CAN use the same powerheads (the Yamato 102's and 302's are legal in both classes, 20SSH allows the Sidewinder and Yamato 80). Age to run, 15 vs 16, and 440 vs 400 lbs. VERY close if you ask me. Seems to me that if you put these two classes together, that you would have say 20 boats together, instead of 2 10 boat runs. I feel that the bigger fields make more entertaining racing (to market), and you would save time on race-day trying to get everyone through their heats.

    So, to take these classes, I'd say, essentially split the differences; Change the max hull weight, split the difference, make it 420, drop the Yamato 80 and the Sidewinder, and change the age to 15. Now you have one class. I understand the guys with the Yamato 80's, and the Sidewinders would seem to be without a place to go, and this again is the downside to this; you can't force them to go out and buy new motors; it is this that I have no real solution too.

    I know it will never happen because of the slight differences, again, just seems to me that it would be better for the sport to have say 3 levels in each category, thus instead of having 100 drivers participating in 6 categories, you would have 90 drivers participating in 3 categories.

    I would also think that If there were enough cooperation that the odds of getting an outboard manufacturer on board to start producing motors here in the US for all classes would be better, and thus, making things more affordable. You could viably use a single racing lower on a 15, 25 and 35 hp unit, same mid section, just swap powerhead to bridge between the suggested 3 classes.

    This kind of problem isn't limited to outboards, but OPC and other classes as well.

    I could also see some viability of running a race like the Baja 500, or the LeMans races, with all the classes on the course at the same time, and total time would take things for each class; You'd likely see more "racing" too, as the number of boats on the water would increase traffic. The downside of this is the timing; we would need a viable computerized timing system, which is a fairly large expense, or even more scorers during a race, again, added expenses. Also, imagine the number of restarts with too many boats on the course; you may not get more than 2 or 3 laps of clean racing...

    Anyway, just my thoughts; I've made a decision of the "path" I will be taking getting involved in boat racing that take into account the area I live in, costs, and "natural progression", but I'm still not sure, and I've been at this whole boat thing for a long time, and working with boat racing for a few years now.

    There is no perfect solution I don't think, but just wanted to hear some other opinions.

    Thanks for the feedback, I appreciate it
    Wayne

  9. #9
    Sam Cullis Mark75H's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Annapolis, MD USA
    Posts
    1,795
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    The problem is if you match top speed, there is still an acceleration advantage.

    Generally the parity choice comes to whether one class passes the other at the end of the straight or coming out of the corner.

    There is no 100% parity and its so off that it can never make it "fair". The only group that is even close is the C/20 you already mention. Since they are already running the same powerhead ... just eliminate C. Try that politically ...


    Multi class Marathon racing already exists, its just not popular - evidenced by the fact that you were not aware of it.

    There is nothing that can be done that will attract a major manufacturer to produce small racing outboards again ... its part of the past that will not come back. Ditto on "affordable" small race motors. Manufacturing and distribution costs are too high. The past several generations of small racers were made and sold at break even or loss and the bean counters know this. For quite some time to come, the bean counters will rule.
    Last edited by Mark75H; 08-19-2011 at 04:57 AM.
    Since 1925, about 150 different racing outboards have been made.


  10. #10
    Team Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Battle Creek, MI
    Posts
    296
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Suggestion

    Take a look at the classes NBRA does run. They have very effectivley consolidate/combined every class that APBA Mod/Stock Outboards has. I can honeslty say the competition is very close, there is no clear engine of choice. I think to many people listen to each and every cry of parity and don't move forward with action.

    I just saying.... not preaching. Experience has shown me what they do is working.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. "Name That Outboard"
    By Tomtall in forum Outboard Racing History
    Replies: 383
    Last Post: 07-25-2020, 06:01 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •