Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Page 8 of 21 FirstFirst 123456789101112131415161718192021 LastLast
Results 71 to 80 of 210

Thread: At long last - Merc 666!

  1. #71
    Team Member R Austin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    ludington Michigan
    Posts
    248
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tim Kurcz View Post
    All early (Mark series) Mercs were alternate firing twins, or stacks of them phased evenly around the crank circle. So, pulse tuned exhaust is not possible. As a result, the 666 will run Parker converging stacks. Sam can confirm, but I'm pretty sure the first pulse tuned Merc six was the 1000 in about 1962.

    Otherwise, I saw a rotary valve Mark 30H at Ted Millers about 10 years ago. Painted yellow, it was likely built for alky in an attempt to beat the Koenig, the builder unknown. Similar to a Champion Hot Rod, the questions is always; how well did it work? Will take a trip to Dick Austin's thread and check out his work.

    For a moment I'd given thought to turbocharging the project, because of the easy to change external pyramid reeds. But then it wouldn't have that beautiful stack of carbs, or fearsome exhaust elbows and megs. Also, deflectors aren't the best choice for forced induction because of the pistons domes. So, it stays the "666".

    Tim
    Your comment about the firing order changing with the 100 Merc caught my attention. Haveing been a Mercury dealer for 13 years I never saw a in-line 6 that was not cylinder pairs that fired 180 degrees apart. To the best of knowledge, that is true, thru the last in-line ( 1500 ) 6 cylinder. All in-lines share a common reed block and carb, having cylinder out of 180 dregree phase would cause havic with the induction system. However this ran a chill thru my spine because an out of phase crank could only be possible with an external reed motor, the TII X!!! I had bought a TII X crank for the Beast becuase of the seven mains. I checked that crank and sure enought, it is an out of phase firing crank. That crank will not work in the Beast because it has the siamees exhaust ports and must be 180 degree firing. Back to the planning board for new reed - bearing block replacements. Anyone need a TII X crank?
    Last edited by R Austin; 08-26-2012 at 06:24 AM. Reason: grqammer erros

  2. #72
    Team Member Droll-l6's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    37
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Anyone need a TII X crank?
    Drop me a PM and you can be off with it

    Arne Kjetil
    My engines :
    Mercury TII, next project
    Johnson V4m-10s 90 hp 1964,from the prosess.
    Mercury 1400 1972 ,Rebuilding a Tower

  3. #73
    Sam Cullis Mark75H's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Annapolis, MD USA
    Posts
    1,795
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by R Austin View Post
    I checked that crank and sure enought, it is an out of phase firing crank. That crank will not work in the Beast because it has the siamees exhaust ports and must be 180 degree firing. Back to the planning board for new reed - bearing block replacements. Anyone need a TII X crank?
    I was going to tell you that, but you said "no comments or suggestions"
    Since 1925, about 150 different racing outboards have been made.


  4. #74
    Administrator Ron Hill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Tustin, California
    Posts
    3,407
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default 60 Degree and 90 Degree

    Chad Hill had a couple of Yamaha V-6 motors. He decided to line bore the cases and install Merc V-6 cranks, rods and pistons. Everything went fine, until we went to start it....60 degree timing base is different than a 90 degree....If it had run it would have gone rum, rum, rum rum bum bum bum, rum....Only couls us 2 grand...saved the pistons, cranks and rods for Mercs....Seemed like a great idea at the time!

  5. #75
    Team Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Horseshoe Bend, ID
    Posts
    657
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Making chips

    Quote Originally Posted by Aeroliner View Post
    Hi Tim,
    Engine is really getting there fast. At the rate your moving you will be running it in 4 weeks. Your making so many chips that you could sell bags of them to help with the cost of creating the work of art.

    Alan
    LOL! Never intending to build more than one, the castings were not fully developed. A good guess is 20% of the molds are converted to chips. The image below is just from fitting the cages. The vac is getting heavy on its wheels.......

    TimName:  666 chips.JPG
Views: 851
Size:  178.3 KB

  6. #76
    Team Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Horseshoe Bend, ID
    Posts
    657
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by R Austin View Post
    Your comment about the firing order changing with the 100 Merc caught my attention. Haveing been a Mercury dealer for 13 years I never saw a in-line 6 that was not cylinder pairs that fired 180 degrees apart. To the best of knowledge, that is true, thru the last in-line ( 1500 ) 6 cylinder. All in-lines share a common reed block and carb, having cylinder out of 180 dregree phase would cause havic with the induction system. However this ran a chill thru my spine because an out of phase crank could only be possible with an external reed motor, the TII X!!! I had bought a TII X crank for the Beast becuase of the seven mains. I checked that crank and sure enought, it is an out of phase firing crank. That crank will not work in the Beast because it has the siamees exhaust ports and must be 180 degree firing. Back to the planning board for new reed - bearing block replacements. Anyone need a TII X crank?
    Somewhere in my archives is a patent filed by Mercury documenting the 120 degree spacing exhaust pulse tunig as applied to the in-line six. Will dig for it an post. Meanwhile, good luck with your "Beast"

    Tim

  7. #77
    Team Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Horseshoe Bend, ID
    Posts
    657
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Delicate work - cages

    Quote Originally Posted by Fastjeff57 View Post
    Slick! Will you make the reed holders as well?

    Jeff
    Even this effort is less taxing than custom building cages. A big plus is the well developed, petite OMC reed box. Also, the reeds are proven off-the-shelf items from Boyesen. Getting closer.........

    TimName:  666-444.15.JPG
Views: 813
Size:  243.2 KBName:  666-444.16.JPG
Views: 812
Size:  206.9 KBName:  666-444.17.JPG
Views: 851
Size:  219.7 KB

  8. #78
    Team Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Singapore/Melbourne/Italy
    Posts
    780
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    why is it bikes seem to prefer one large reed per side than the outboards with many?

  9. #79
    Team Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Horseshoe Bend, ID
    Posts
    657
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Single reed petals

    Quote Originally Posted by Powerabout View Post
    why is it bikes seem to prefer one large reed per side than the outboards with many?
    Interesting question: My guess is historical design guidelines and parts interchangeability for outboard products that last 30+ years. Motorcyles and snomobiles have a much shorter lifespan and will see more rapid design cycle (and obsolesence).

    Supporting examples are the Boyesen "RAD" cages used in my "Kestrel" OMC loop triple Mod which use a single bottom leaf with three openings, and a single upper leaf covering three openings per side (six total). The same design is used by Boyesen for OMC 8-port cage replacement reeds.

  10. #80
    Team Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Horseshoe Bend, ID
    Posts
    657
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Ouch!

    Quote Originally Posted by R Austin View Post
    Your comment about the firing order changing with the 100 Merc caught my attention. Haveing been a Mercury dealer for 13 years I never saw a in-line 6 that was not cylinder pairs that fired 180 degrees apart. To the best of knowledge, that is true, thru the last in-line ( 1500 ) 6 cylinder. All in-lines share a common reed block and carb, having cylinder out of 180 dregree phase would cause havic with the induction system. However this ran a chill thru my spine because an out of phase crank could only be possible with an external reed motor, the TII X!!! I had bought a TII X crank for the Beast becuase of the seven mains. I checked that crank and sure enought, it is an out of phase firing crank. That crank will not work in the Beast because it has the siamees exhaust ports and must be 180 degree firing. Back to the planning board for new reed - bearing block replacements. Anyone need a TII X crank?
    Sorry to hear about your dilemma. Better to find out about it sooner than later. I'm hoping another Merc crank will do the job! Good luck,

    Tim

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 5 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 5 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •