Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 19

Thread: 1983 Chrysler 150 V6??

  1. #1
    Team Member MTECHMARINE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Milton Florida
    Posts
    55
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default 1983 Chrysler 150 V6??

    One of my customers sent me this series of pictures of an evidently nearly ready for production Chrysler V6! He's in Canada, not the owner.
    The owner of this must be one of you guys, can you shed some historical info with us?
    Compact enough to fit under a 140 cover. Simplicity in engineering as all Chryslers.
    Why not this instead of the inline 5 abortion put into production b US Marine?

    Name:  DSC00114.jpg
Views: 874
Size:  109.2 KB

    Name:  DSC00113.jpg
Views: 915
Size:  123.2 KB

    Name:  DSC00112.jpg
Views: 828
Size:  154.8 KB

    Name:  DSC00111.jpg
Views: 816
Size:  151.9 KB

    Name:  DSC00110.jpg
Views: 797
Size:  111.0 KB

    Name:  DSC00109.jpg
Views: 822
Size:  128.6 KB

  2. #2
    Team Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Singapore/Melbourne/Italy
    Posts
    780
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    WoW
    a bit of history there but one look at the ignition system and the gearbox and you know you wouldnt want one

  3. #3
    Team Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Minocqua WI
    Posts
    55
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Its a proto type, who knows what the production engine would have looked like ??????

  4. #4
    Team Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Quincy Calif
    Posts
    17
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    That is one nice looking motor. I have never had any experience with Chryslers, but looked over a 3 cylinder a couple of months ago. It also looked like a nice design and easy to work on compared with equivalent Mercs. What is wrong with the foot? For a non-racing design looks pretty clean with a semi hatchet shape and a low water pickup to boot.
    kk

  5. #5
    Team Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Singapore/Melbourne/Italy
    Posts
    780
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Krazy Karl View Post
    That is one nice looking motor. I have never had any experience with Chryslers, but looked over a 3 cylinder a couple of months ago. It also looked like a nice design and easy to work on compared with equivalent Mercs. What is wrong with the foot? For a non-racing design looks pretty clean with a semi hatchet shape and a low water pickup to boot.
    kk
    Non thru prop exhaust must mean the box was same design as previous ones which where a nightmare to repair

  6. #6
    Team Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Ifafi, South Africa
    Posts
    94
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Thank you for the exciting photos.Any more info available, like technical specs, loop charged or cross-flow? With Chrysler`s awful history re head gaskets and seizing pistons, I would have thought they should have known better than to use what appears to be only four head bolts per cylinder? Towerhousing and transom bracket look like Mercury clones. BTW, the shape of that lower unit was developed by son Klaus of the German Chrysler Marine distributor August Wiese during his tenure at Berlin Technical University in the second half of the 1960s. The older (Tiger Shark based) lower units were not bad at all,and easy to work on.

  7. #7
    Team Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Singapore/Melbourne/Italy
    Posts
    780
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wolfgang View Post
    Thank you for the exciting photos.Any more info available, like technical specs, loop charged or cross-flow? With Chrysler`s awful history re head gaskets and seizing pistons, I would have thought they should have known better than to use what appears to be only four head bolts per cylinder? Towerhousing and transom bracket look like Mercury clones. BTW, the shape of that lower unit was developed by son Klaus of the German Chrysler Marine distributor August Wiese during his tenure at Berlin Technical University in the second half of the 1960s. The older (Tiger Shark based) lower units were not bad at all,and easy to work on.
    I think it is a looper?
    yes old fridges were easy to work on later ones of from about 50hp and up were terrible, you needed more tools that a speedmaster needs to rebuild a gearbox.
    Thats style of gearbox and prop is good to about 40mph then that big angle from the pinion back on top of the bullet cavitates and burns the prop at the root of the blades. same design that BMW used when they showed the world they new nothing about marine engines and drives
    The ignition system in the last years were also problem to troubleshoot
    Shame the engine never made it though.

  8. #8
    Team Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Ifafi, South Africa
    Posts
    94
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    In this context (I am just now taking up boating again after a 35 year break): would a (carburated) 2ltr Merc V6 powerhead fit under the (louvered) cowling of a 120hp Force? Disregarding issues like tower housing/tuners/lower unit.
    Any advice from you guys in the w.shops would be appreciated.Thanks in advance.

  9. #9
    Team Member Bill Gohr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    198
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    The block looks just like an early 122cu in Mec, down to the water passage across the top, the intake also seems to mirror a vertical reed merc, as well as the head castings. What kind of carbs are those? Judging by the port castings on the side of the block that would be a looper.

    And yes a V6 Merc fits under that cowl, we have a friend down south who is a Chrysler freak who has a carb merc under a Chrysler cowl now

  10. #10
    Team Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    40
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Powerabout View Post
    I think it is a looper?
    yes old fridges were easy to work on later ones of from about 50hp and up were terrible, you needed more tools that a speedmaster needs to rebuild a gearbox.
    Thats style of gearbox and prop is good to about 40mph then that big angle from the pinion back on top of the bullet cavitates and burns the prop at the root of the blades. same design that BMW used when they showed the world they new nothing about marine engines and drives
    The ignition system in the last years were also problem to troubleshoot
    Shame the engine never made it though.
    I believe BMW knows little about any vehicle!!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. More from EP Class 1977-1985
    By Smokin' Joe in forum Outboard Racing History
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 09-02-2010, 05:33 AM
  2. St. Louis 1985
    By Ted March in forum Outboard Racing History
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 08-15-2007, 05:34 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •