Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Page 9 of 12 FirstFirst 123456789101112 LastLast
Results 81 to 90 of 116

Thread: Max Speed Attainable with These Fgures

  1. #81
    Administrator Ron Hill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Tustin, California
    Posts
    3,407
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default I Had A 30 Mercury Cleaver

    Quote Originally Posted by champ20B View Post
    LOL!!!!!!! If anyone could ever make a prop, or vessel as well for that matter, that will run in water at 100%, they would be BILLIONAIRES OVERNIGHT!!!!!! Hell, they'd rule the industry from powerskiffs to battleships.
    There can be close calls (90+%), but 100% wont ever happen.
    I had a 15 X 30 on my V-8 Johnson than ran through the kilo at 118 MPH. At that time, we figured it was 110% efficiency. I concluded, that Mercury didn't include the CUP as part of their pitch.

  2. #82
    pdt
    Guest

    Default

    champ you have said it perfectly, thank you very much.

    I was losing the will to live,.

    im so glad to know there is someone else out there on the forum who truly understands physics.

    once again thanks


    now let the thread close.

  3. #83
    Sabine River Gang MWhite's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Sabine River
    Posts
    606
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by champ20B View Post
    I don't know what all the hen-house squabble is for in reference to math. MATH DOESN'T LIE AND THE LAW OF PHYSICS DON'T CHANGE FOR NOBODY!!! All the pitch/RPM calculations are for is to determine prop slip.... AFTER TESTING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    THAT IS IT!!!! Beyond that, you either have a good prop or some peice of crap that somebody carved on or cobbled up or a bad set up overall. PERIOD!!!
    The GPS don't lie either and it puts pen and paper theory out the window. PERIOD.
    Let it all Hang out

  4. #84
    Administrator Ron Hill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Tustin, California
    Posts
    3,407
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Enjoy BRF, Let's Not Get.......

    Quote Originally Posted by HankFrazier View Post
    I'M ONLY STATING A FACT THE SMART PEOPLE ON THIS THREAD CAN TELL WHAT YOU ARE WEARING BY THAT ENDLESS STREAM OF BULL**** THAT YOU KEEP GOING ON AND ON ABOUT. HAVE YOU EVER BEEN IN A RACE OR RACE BOAT/ if you have prove it post pictures and speeds.Let us see how fast you can make a boat go.
    I help several high schools with their Solar Race boat and three coleges with their solar race boats. I laugh, not openly, but one thing all these "KIDS" have in common is they have never driven a boat, never raced a boat, never been to a boat race and none of their teachers have driven a boat, or been to a boat race........But the colleges all have "COMPUTERS" to help them design boats. AND they all look about the same......thye look like submarines.

    Chad and I had a "DISCUSSION" about my two motors, one prop theory. He said, one motor wasn't turning 7,200 RPM's....I never had a tach in the boat, so he might have a point, but I told him he was wrong.

    I said, "Explain this. My OLD "C" Runabout ran 56 MPH on a good day. Same prop on my new boat ran 59-60 MPH. In my mind, my 30-H was turning 7,200 RPM's on both boats"

  5. #85
    pdt
    Guest

    Default

    Mike go ask the other fellow to explain it to you.
    because you will never belive me, even if I was standing on a stack of bibles with jesus Christ next to me backing me up.

  6. #86
    pdt
    Guest

    Default

    ron you wrote

    I said, "Explain this. My OLD "C" Runabout ran 56 MPH on a good day. Same prop on my new boat ran 59-60 MPH. In my mind, my 30-H was turning 7,200 RPM's on both boats" .....



    how did you come to the idea of 7,200 rpms rons,

    1/ did you just pick that figure out the air ?
    2/ listen to the engine and could hear it was exactly 7200 ?
    or
    3? have a good idea due to the figures you had worked out with pitch ,gear ratio and speed reached ?

  7. #87
    Team Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    233
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Well then.......

    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Hill View Post
    I had a 15 X 30 on my V-8 Johnson than ran through the kilo at 118 MPH. At that time, we figured it was 110% efficiency. I concluded, that Mercury didn't include the CUP as part of their pitch.
    Well then, you simply found that the figure given by the manufacturer wasn't right. It was inaccurate. The old pen and paper showed you that, so you went to see why it was!!

    THANK GOODNESS FOR MATH (ESTIMATION FORMULAS)!!!!!!

  8. #88
    Team Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    233
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MWhite View Post
    The GPS don't lie either and it puts pen and paper theory out the window. PERIOD.
    What?????? No No No. One uses the formula to give a direct speed that is only "theoretical". One then takes the boat and records the ACTUAL SPEED ON THE "GPS". From these two speeds, one can see what the slippage is, or in Ron's case, if the pitch given is accurate or not. That's all it is and there is nothing wrong with it. Its a good thing!!

  9. #89
    Team Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    233
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    In physics, a solid (ie; propeller) will displace a liquid (ie; water). Water is not stable material as a propeller in structure. Water will not stand up. It can be propelled or swam through but never tracked like solid ground. That is why 100% wont happen.

  10. #90
    Sabine River Gang HankFrazier's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Sabine, River
    Posts
    224
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by champ20b View Post
    in physics, a solid (ie; propeller) will displace a liquid (ie; water). Water is not stable material as a propeller in structure. Water will not stand up. It can be propelled or swam through but never tracked like solid ground. That is why 100% wont happen.
    i have got a pretty good reputation when it comes to testing and tuning race boats and motors i do a lot of my own custom stuff. I also do a lot of custom work for other people.i have the fastest flat bottom aluminum boat that i have ever seen.and i have come to the conclusion that i am no where near smart enough to hold a conversation with pdt or champ 20b much less try to talk about how to make a boat go fast. I've only been doing it 35 years and as far as i can see ya'll can do in 10 minutes with pen and paper what it has taken me a life time to figure out.
    Strictly business

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. need more speed
    By deejaycee_2000 in forum Mini Boats and Mini Boats History
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 02-04-2008, 03:38 PM
  2. Power Cat Speed
    By Dago Fast in forum Technical Discussion
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 02-03-2007, 09:39 PM
  3. Top Speed
    By SEAHORSE50 in forum Technical Discussion
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 12-16-2005, 09:52 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •