not mad, just trying to get my boat up to speed,moss point eace just around the corner, to be the man i got to outrun the man.(srg) call me i lost all my cell phone numbers.
not mad, just trying to get my boat up to speed,moss point eace just around the corner, to be the man i got to outrun the man.(srg) call me i lost all my cell phone numbers.
out front again
this is what i know for a fact.....there was a group of engineers that designed a boat that they said was the biggest, fastest and most unsinkable boat ever built , and on its first trip out they were right, almost it was the fastest boat to the bottom of the ocean and we all know where it was desighned and built and what its name was need i say more.
Strictly business
yes you are correct hank
it was actually built in Ireland not England.
it was designed by an Irishman too, not English.
it sank very quickly as you say, .
I take it you did also know where the charts for its voyage were designed made and printed ? ENGLAND.
if only the captain had taken notice of the English charts and kept to the original course we would probably never of even heard of the titanic..
MWhite
don't try twisting it all again, let omcstratos answer for himself, you had a go at a simple question , you then answered the question a while back and made a
complete Pratt of yourself in doing so and any engineer who saw will be smiling to himself.
let stratos do his bit, ya never know he might be able to dig a load up off google within an hour or so ,
whatever he does it wont be worse than yours that's for sure, especially after all the bragging you've done about knowing stuff etc and condemning me while making such a hash of it ha ha .
must admit I was almost fooled that you really knew stuff and was going to come up with a sensible answer to the flywheel question, but with your answer you proved your knowledge.
But I really did appreciate the laugh it gave me, it really was good.
as for the above question to be answered by me would be a travesty, I shalkl llet omcstratos give his own reply.
come on stratos, show them all that your not a dummy who just follows the pack.
.
For once you agree with someone on here. Removing a pound here and there adds up. But why would you want to put a heavy flywheel on the motor and weigh it back down? You may be an engineer, but I can find a lot of your questions on here that give me reason to think you still aren't a know it all.
And you say you know everything about oil, but you make is sound like you learned it all from an oil thread on here recently. You keep contradicting yourself.
And PDT, I'd like to hear your explanation about "stored energy" of a flywheel.
You were on here a month ago and didn't understand the torque vs. horsepower. You didn't understand how the torque curve falls while horsepower keeps pulling on up. But now you are an expert on flywheels and oil lubrication qualities.
you are correct that your not an engineer
But you have butted in and made yourself look a proper knobhead just like mike.
unless you know what your talking about or atleast have an idea then don't join in and attack just because your boyfriend is attacking someone.
flywheel being heavy helps the crankshaft with vibration, it keeps an engine from stalling at slow speed, it creates more torque once it gets spinning.
now with a boat engine that needs to push a heavy boat or a loaded boat we need a heavy flywheel for slow speed, if only going fast and full rpm 99% of the time it could be lightened.
but it would not be of any use to keep any power in the engine !!!!!!
sometime a go a topic came up about horsepower and torque etc, it was about torque dropping off and hp still rising... if the flywheel was heavy it would make this possible, but if the flywheel is very
light then what happens if we get a touch of cavitaion on a bend or coming out of a corner ? where is the stored energy going to come from / because the flywheel has not got enough in it.
a heavy flywheel is slower to get going, but also slower to stop it.
I do not profess to know it all, there is ****loads of outboard parts that I have never delved into and would not ever attempt to argue about.
plus when it comes to outboard electrics I am a nightmare waiting to happen, electrics I have never been any good with at all.
there is nowhere on this or any other forum where I have ever argued anything on porting an engine, how to enlarge the ports or how to move the port timming.
ive never done it to a outboard and know much about outboard porting.
I have never argued about lots of stuff on the outboard engines, if its something I do not know and think it will be of value to me I will ask the question.
But I am not daft like so many , and can instantly see total bollocks when its written.
as for the oil, then no I have not just read it on here and copied it etc. there is some on here ,its pretty basic stuff.
If you read what I wrote you woukld notice I talked about keeping the engine, not going fast and not caring if it gets destroyed in just 1 race.
Any engineer or real racer on here will know that more oil has proven to give more power, not saying its a huge increase but it is an increase.
I have not contradicted myself, the answers and questions I raised have been twisted and turned by others to maybe look like I have contradicted all sorts, but again go
back and look for yourself.
don't just take things out of context like some fools do, read the passage just like it has been written.
I have not and have never professed to be an expert engineer, an engine designer or a professor of science and physics.
.
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)
Bookmarks