Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: boring out cylinders ??

  1. #1
    Team Member fs5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    208
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default boring out cylinders ??

    do you get much of a gain by boring out your cylinders?
    would goin from a standard bore size to a .030 or .040 give you much more performance ?
    thanks

  2. #2
    Team Member zul8tr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Orlando, Fla
    Posts
    509
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I know "there is no replacement for displacement" but I believe the gain is not that noticeable in a high rev 2 cycle engine when you consider that the larger pistons weigh more and that is a negative. I would only bore from standard if needed to straighten the cylinder and keep it to a minimum overbore. An example is my 2 cylinder 25ss that I raced a lot. Had to straighten the bore after all the use to +015 next size up. I went from the std 3 ring Merc pistons to the 2 ring Merc +015 pistons, pin rings and retainers and they weigh more than the standard piston assembly. The engine runs about the same with the butt dino and my tack and speed info. Compression testing revealed no significant increase over the std. setup.
    " Three may keep a secret if two of them are dead" Ben Franklin
    " ------- well Doctor what have we got a Republic or Monarchy? A Republic he replies if you can keep it"
    Benjamin Franklin, 1787 Constitutional Convention, as recorded by signer James McHenry's in his diary at the Library of Congress

    Location: SW Orlando, Fl

  3. #3
    Team Member fs5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    208
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    thanks mate, what about a low rever like mine ? it likes to sit around 5300/5800 tops.
    i run longer plugs , with a couple extra washers so the plugs sit further in the dome giving me a bit more comp. this works for me giving us around 3kph better topend.
    would oversize boring increase compression ?
    thanks

  4. #4
    Team Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Singapore/Melbourne/Italy
    Posts
    780
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fs5 View Post
    thanks mate, what about a low rever like mine ? it likes to sit around 5300/5800 tops.
    i run longer plugs , with a couple extra washers so the plugs sit further in the dome giving me a bit more comp. this works for me giving us around 3kph better topend.
    would oversize boring increase compression ?
    thanks
    of course, you wont find anyone running in sst45 with stock bore, they rebuild and start at 030

  5. #5
    Team Member zul8tr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Orlando, Fla
    Posts
    509
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fs5 View Post
    thanks mate, what about a low rever like mine ? it likes to sit around 5300/5800 tops.
    i run longer plugs , with a couple extra washers so the plugs sit further in the dome giving me a bit more comp. this works for me giving us around 3kph better topend.
    would oversize boring increase compression ?
    thanks
    That is good that you find the longer plugs work and not a problem since you pull them often before carbon and heat affect the exposed threads. But note that the sharp edges of the exposed threads is a potential hot spot that could promote pre-ignition.

    Since you ask about compression ratio only way to get specific is by math, so here is an example.

    CR = Compression ratio = (CV + HCV)/ HCV

    CV = cylinder volume TDC to BDC, but the real volume for a 2 cycle is TDC to top of exhaust port which is less.
    HCV = head combustion chamber volume

    all units the same like cubic inches.

    So if you increase the CV with bore job by 0.030 and leave the HCV the same there might be a slight increase as example will show.

    Example: Say the bore is D = 3", stroke is 3" and HCV = 2.5 cu. in

    CV = stroke x pi x D^2/4 = 3 x (3.14 x 3 x 3)/4 = 21.21 cu. in

    CR = (21.21 + 2.5)/2.5 = 9.48 :1

    If you bore 0.030 over then D = 3.030"

    CV = 3 x (pi x 3.030 x 3.030)/4 = 21.63 cu. in

    If HCV is the same at 2.5 cu. in

    Then CR = (21.63 + 2.5)/2.5 = 9.65:1 and increase of 1.8%

    Weigh that against the increased weight of the oversize piston. A low revving engine will be better
    tolerate the heavier piston assembly that a high revving engine. More rotating mass affects acceleration.

    Run specific numbers with your engine.

    Do you have a blind bore engine with cast on cylinder head or is it a removable cylinder head? Is it legal to machine the head to reduce the HCV? That would be a better way to increase compression ratio.
    " Three may keep a secret if two of them are dead" Ben Franklin
    " ------- well Doctor what have we got a Republic or Monarchy? A Republic he replies if you can keep it"
    Benjamin Franklin, 1787 Constitutional Convention, as recorded by signer James McHenry's in his diary at the Library of Congress

    Location: SW Orlando, Fl

  6. #6
    Team Member fs5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    208
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    yeah mate its a blind bore 59 ci merc motor.
    i just use it for fun fanging round with my mates
    standard bore is 2.993 stroke is 2.795

    yeah i pull the plugs after each trip,
    thanks

  7. #7
    Team Member zul8tr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Orlando, Fla
    Posts
    509
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Blind bore machining takes one that knows how to do it, not just any machinist.
    " Three may keep a secret if two of them are dead" Ben Franklin
    " ------- well Doctor what have we got a Republic or Monarchy? A Republic he replies if you can keep it"
    Benjamin Franklin, 1787 Constitutional Convention, as recorded by signer James McHenry's in his diary at the Library of Congress

    Location: SW Orlando, Fl

  8. #8
    Team Member fs5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    208
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    yeah mate , thats one thing i've heard a lot of.
    thanks for the info

  9. #9
    Team Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    124
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Fs5 email me tyst67@hotmail.com

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Boring Prop?
    By BJuby in forum Technical Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12-03-2012, 03:53 PM
  2. Benefits of overboring cylinders?
    By BRzuki in forum Technical Discussion
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 03-24-2011, 12:09 AM
  3. Rings for chrome bore cylinders
    By Fastjeff57 in forum Technical Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-07-2008, 05:19 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •