Page 5 of 9 FirstFirst 123456789 LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 82

Thread: 56ci OMC realistic power

  1. #41
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    289
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I read that the early 56 was sandcast blocks then went to lost foam around 1988 - 1989 when the sst60 with its hand finished lost foam block was introduced.
    funny how those that worked at omc building the motors would get that wrong .

    be nice to know how they used a permanent mold to do the closed engine exhaust.

  2. #42
    Team Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    29
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    The early 56 block was not sand cast. It was permanent mold. The surface was smooth and shaped very well. The proto type engine tested for SST 60 was made of this, but when the engine was manufactured, it came out as foam block and did not run as fast as the prototype. The permanent mold blocks were never legal as they are faster. The foam block were cheaper to manufacture and issues like the glue lines slowed them down. Ports in the foam blocks were less consistent.
    Most engines that come to me are very worn out. I can rebuild with fresh good parts and make them good. But I you say I need to win, it is much harder because then only certain parts are required to do that. Those are hard to find, impossible to make.
    I need a good clean block, not hard to find. I use my own special liners. All with in the rules. I can fix the bad boost ports per the rules. But you still have a missing link.
    Thanks sabine river killer thanked for this post

  3. #43
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    289
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Mike Wienandt

    would it be better to use the head from the oval port 56 being as its thicker material ? part no 339221 normal thickness is 0.240 (6.096mm) at thermostat area.
    if machined down to sst60 spec it still leaves 0.0150 (3.81mm) at the thermostat area, not as ultra thin like some bridgeport 56 heads.
    I measured at the thermostat and at the bottom area to see if both the same and they are uniform from what I could see.
    Likes hupiveneilija liked this post

  4. #44
    Team Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    29
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Yes, that sounds like good idea.

  5. #45
    Team Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    33
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ferdthe4 View Post
    I understand what you mean by the cowbell shape and I finally found the thread that had the inlet and outlet size specs of the sst 60 tuner barried in fast freds mod 50 secrets page 76

    http://www.boatracingfacts.com/forum...hread-2/page76

    inlet on exhaust base plate 1 1/2" x 1 3/4" outlet 2 3/8" x 2 3/8" what over all length works best in a long shaft mid is what I'm trying to figure out now. I've got a tig welder so welding up my own tuner isn't an issue trying to come up with ball park specs for when I finally get to tearing into my spare engine.
    this is for etec 90ho - 75hp triple, looks really close..................................get gasket #6 to verify

    http://www.ebay.com/itm/350538-Inner...5Yu9EG&vxp=mtrName:  90 bell top.JPG
Views: 1059
Size:  44.3 KBName:  90 etec bell.JPG
Views: 993
Size:  37.7 KBName:  90 etec megaphone.JPG
Views: 1048
Size:  61.5 KB
    Last edited by MODIFIEDOUTBOARD; 08-24-2017 at 06:23 PM. Reason: more etec spam
    Likes filthy phill liked this post

  6. #46
    Team Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    29
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Measure the length from powerhead gasket to the end of the tuner. Make it 1" longer than the SST 60 spec for a V bottom. It will have more bottom end yet rev high enough to make you go fast.
    Thanks ferdthe4 thanked for this post
    Likes hydrospeed77 liked this post

  7. #47
    Team Member hupiveneilija's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    263
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by filthy phill View Post
    Mike Wienandt

    would it be better to use the head from the oval port 56 being as its thicker material ? part no 339221 normal thickness is 0.240 (6.096mm) at thermostat area.
    if machined down to sst60 spec it still leaves 0.0150 (3.81mm) at the thermostat area, not as ultra thin like some bridgeport 56 heads.
    I measured at the thermostat and at the bottom area to see if both the same and they are uniform from what I could see.
    This is what i said somewhere else. I got one yesterday that im going to use next, modded offcourse.

    Question: wich headgasket 1mm or 1.5mm? Easiest to get here is thicker sierra but wich is better for squeeze area in this engine? And how thin you can go for it, havent decked block yet.

    And thanks for writing those things, really good information and very clear said!

  8. #48
    Team Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    29
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Are both head gaskets the same quality material. The really old black OMC ones were best but can't get them anymore. As far as the thickness, Check the squish clearance. Don't want less than .040" or 1mm
    Does the piston stick up above the block, any amount then use the 1.5mm
    Good luck
    Mike

  9. #49
    Team Member hupiveneilija's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    263
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Thanks,
    Jani

  10. #50
    Team Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    34
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mike Wienandt View Post
    Measure the length from powerhead gasket to the end of the tuner. Make it 1" longer than the SST 60 spec for a V bottom. It will have more bottom end yet rev high enough to make you go fast.
    Thank you for the advice my issue is still how long are sst 60 exhaust tuners? Maybe I've been looking through all the wrong threads but I haven't been able to find what the length of sst60 tuners are.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. 60 overs 56ci
    By 850cc racer in forum Technical Discussion
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-15-2010, 03:23 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •