Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: crackerbox rule updates

  1. #1
    Team Member p28 renegade's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    modesto, ca
    Posts
    212
    Post Thanks / Like

    Thumbs up crackerbox rule updates

    Okay crackerboxers.

    Here is a quick readers digest version of what was handled at Detroit meeting


    Rule proposal for min weight increase ::: failed min weight still 1250 lbs

    Rule proposal for aftermarket/performance blocks ::: passed. This was a no
    Brainer for it was reviewed once in 99 and again in 03 it just never got into rule book

    Rule proposal for sporstman motor package ::: by way of tech committee it failed and irc backed decision. The term is over and no experimental motors are on the table.

    Rule proposal for 1/8 th tolerance in bottom :::: passed.
    Now what the rule means that instead of a total flat measurement with no variance from flat basicly a zero tolerance, you now have an 1/8” of tolerance for age, settling , slop
    And trailer settling. It DOES not mean you can now taylor your bottom to have an 1/8th
    Concave tunnel. Bottom still needs to be flat, you now have room for
    Slop. Hope we all understand this rule.

    You can expect more hull inspections in the future then in years past. This would be so that we know where your hull stands. You sure wouldn’t want to find out at the nationals
    Or divisionals that your hull is out of spec and loose a title or a podium finish.

    Gang we all forget that the hull is the main part of our race rigs and it deserves and needs just as much attn as we give our motors and props and steering. When you think about it the hull takes the most abuse and just as a motor, it does have specs and its your job to ensure it is in spec.

  2. #2
    Team Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Orange Curtain
    Posts
    120
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Strakes?

    What about strakes? Was it brought up? How can you measure the bottom if there is a piece of metal running the length of the bottom? I can't believe this was not discussed. This has been the biggest concern with the class since last April.
    Jeff.

  3. #3
    Team Member p28 renegade's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    modesto, ca
    Posts
    212
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    the boat owners recieved a response from the rules sub commtee about all the other proposals. in short most of them are now in the hands of the tech commitee to decide on racing definitions so to speak and once that glossary is created, then other items will be addressed. and this would be an inboard terms of definitions for the apba in whole.

    as far as measuring bottoms there is no issue. there is a set proceedure in place as outlined on the inboard web site on how to measure the racing runabout.
    regardless of what attachements that are on the bottom it does not create an issue. just got to know where to look. it used to be in the actual rule book, but to save print, it was relagated to the web site for when needed.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Flywheel Rule for Tri Hulls
    By Ron Hill in forum Tunnel Outboards and Tri Hulls
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 02-14-2008, 11:36 PM
  2. Attn Crackerbox Owners
    By p28 renegade in forum Mini Boats and Mini Boats History
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-15-2008, 10:52 AM
  3. 2007 UIM Rule Book Link
    By Composite Specialties in forum Mini Boats and Mini Boats History
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-24-2007, 09:56 AM
  4. Boating Magazine Crackerbox Article
    By rossdbos in forum Mini Boats and Mini Boats History
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-20-2007, 12:42 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •