Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Old Hot Rodder, New Questions

  1. #1
    Team Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Bloomington, MN
    Posts
    29
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Old Hot Rodder, New Questions

    Well, I have one motor done. Some mild porting, a little compression. Ran it in the tank for a couple hours. I think it will work.

    One to go, but having a hard time finding a '58 35 horse core.

    My question: there is about 1" space between the Cav plate, and the bottom of the boat. I would like to raise the motors up 1/2". Can I get buy with the water intake on the nose by the prop, and block off the intake above the cavitation plate? Or do I have to build some type of remote pick-up?






    Thanks
    Jerry

  2. #2
    - Skoontz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Encinitas, California
    Posts
    581
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    You should be able to routinely put the cav plates at least an inch above the boat bottom. Remember, the water pick up is the screen behind the propeller and when in gear they will feed from the prop wash.

    It's been a while since you last posted and i can't remmeber, are you going to install some type of nose cone? Usually the water pick up is placed up front on those.

    That will allow you to jack the motor way up.
    Bill Schwab
    Dirty Deck Brewing
    Company

  3. #3
    Sam Cullis Mark75H's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Annapolis, MD USA
    Posts
    1,795
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    It will "work" ... the question is will it be worth the effort?
    Since 1925, about 150 different racing outboards have been made.


  4. #4
    Team Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Bloomington, MN
    Posts
    29
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I have a friend with 2 35s on his boat, and one motor overheats. The only thing I could think of is that there's no water above the cav plate on the Starboard motor, causing it to suck air. Is it worth it? This is a boat I drove 4,000 miles in a blizzard to pick up (free boat). I'll have over a grand in the motors (free motors) I just don't want to melt them down. I just want to get as much drag out of the water without getting radical.

  5. #5
    Sam Cullis Mark75H's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Annapolis, MD USA
    Posts
    1,795
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I was referring to the porting, your response seems to reply to the motor height.

    We know nothing about your friend's set up. You didn't tell us how much higher his motors are, nor if he has tried switching them left and right to see if there is another problem other than the height.
    Since 1925, about 150 different racing outboards have been made.


  6. #6
    Team Member JohnsonM50's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Jersey
    Posts
    602
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Skoontz View Post
    You should be able to routinely put the cav plates at least an inch above the boat bottom. Remember, the water pick up is the screen behind the propeller and when in gear they will feed from the prop wash.

    It's been a while since you last posted and i can't remmeber, are you going to install some type of nose cone? Usually the water pick up is placed up front on those.

    That will allow you to jack the motor way up.
    Yes it would allow you to raise the motor but the prop will have limits there. 1" above the bottom will work well, even 1 1/2 might. If you can find an adaptable speed prop would be a different story.
    The upper intake is an auxillery for 'in reverse' since the prop wont thrust water in the pickup spinning backwards. You could cover it & avoid backin up. It also could be used as a place to add water from an external pitot...

    The pump system on yours is different, it has a return line. youd need to test with care, good news is the return line is because it pumps more than it needs to. Keep up the work & Good Luck.

  7. #7
    - Skoontz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Encinitas, California
    Posts
    581
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    There are a number of reasons an old 35 could be running hot other than too high or not enough water. They had an overheating issue during that era, i beleive it was related to head gasket/thermostats, but it has been 30 some years since I worked on one that got hot.
    Bill Schwab
    Dirty Deck Brewing
    Company

  8. #8
    Team Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Bloomington, MN
    Posts
    29
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Thanks for the picture Mike. I like that setup. There is no return. My 4 cyls have a return, but just 1 tube in the 35s. Stats started in '58, but I run the older head without a stat. I'm not planning in trolling backwards, so my guess is I won't overheat backing away from the dock, so I'll give blocking it off a shot. I don't want to get into surface props, or any trick stuff, although if I could find a couple 2 blade brassies cheap. With two motors getting on plane isn't a problem. It's all about looking cool. LOL

    Thanks guys
    What a great bunch!!
    Jerry

  9. #9
    Team Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Singapore/Melbourne/Italy
    Posts
    780
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    We used to race 6 and 25 hp ( 1980) with that style of gearcase and we could go as high as 1 " below ( propshaft that is) and the prop would deliver the water to the pick up no probs

  10. #10
    Team Member JohnsonM50's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Jersey
    Posts
    602
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Powerabout View Post
    We used to race 6 and 25 hp ( 1980) with that style of gearcase and we could go as high as 1 " below ( propshaft that is) and the prop would deliver the water to the pick up no probs
    Ive experimented with my Airborn & a SS performance prop stock to the OMC 25 [not a surface prop]. It had a limit of the anticav-plate being about 1 3/4 above the bottom [flat]. Any higher it would cavitate hopelessly. Anywhere below where it would run was fine cooling with many miles on at 39-41mph.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Mercury TII questions...
    By Droll-l6 in forum Technical Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-11-2009, 12:20 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •